Saturday, September 10, 2011

THE NEED FOR THE BLOG

The blog is dedicated to the art style of the inter-war years (1910-1939).
The elegant style that came to be known as Art Deco epitomized luxury and fashion of the Jazz age. Deco effect could be seen in the skylines of New York to Shanghai. The designs of fashionable costumes to mass-produced radios were all altered by it. From fine arts, architecture and interior design, to fashion and textiles, film and photography all adopted this new no-nonsense chic style.
Essentially an eclectic style originated as a one-off masterwork to limited edition pieces, it drew inspirations from the historic western high styles, the vernacular traditions, the exotic non-western traditions, and cultures of far distant past and contemporary avant-garde art. With time Art deco became synonymous with mass-consumption and modernity. Art Deco after all these years is experiencing a come back in a big way.
As part of the final diploma project in the National Institute Of Design (Furniture and Interior Design) I'm required to deal with this style, modernize it and come up with a furniture collection suited to the current times. To be capable of doing so I need to understand this many faceted style and the factors related to have shaped it. This blog is hence a record of my everyday learning.
Information in any forms, online, addresses, links and comments on the posts that follow in the coming days will be very helpful for me too understand ART DECO.
Looking forward for a good participation and a great discussion.

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

The Design Brief in progress.


Indian Design sensibility. When it comes to design, in a space/product relation, how can one with minimum intervention sprinkle the Indian flavor on things? A character that goes beyond “just surface Indianization.” Today all around, I’m witnessing a gamut of things and products declaring their Indian character; designers basking under the sun of creativity and the tag of creators. But the design of a majority of things being sold under the tag “Indian design” is very superficial.

However, a general description of the modern architecture in urban India today would be confused structures of mortar and other construction materials stuck together stripped of thought and ideology. “Aesthetics and design language” go in for a toss in the so termed hasty cost-saving battle. Things that seem beautiful and meaningful unfortunately many a times are replicas or inspired unethically from foreign sources. True intelligent design suiting the context seems a rarity.
The high-end furniture market in the country, with the skill-sets of craftsmen developed over centuries in a variety of product/material techniques and the cheap labor that is available can become the revolution today. It will be pleasing to attach the words - “quality products, original design and efficient production” to the country, a title that Europe has enjoyed since long.
As far as my part is concerned here, I’m on a ride to study the Art Deco to design further.
Deco movement/style is still modern against the sensibility of today and is a movement which accounts to very few that touched the country in whatever restricted way.
In the 1920s and 1930s in India, it appealed to the novelty-Indians who were albeit traditional in many respects but receptive to the foreign values traditions and visual and artistic influences. Adopting to the western lifestyle, traveling to Europe to enjoy season, sightseeing and paying homage to their sovereign, the elite Indian was embracing it with open arms.
Deco cosmopolitanism, sophisticated styling, associations with luxury and glamour and conscious machine age aesthetics appealed to rich India. However the Indian Deco scenario was highly restricted and influenced greatly by French art and style and had little to do with India. The colors, motifs, forms, stories and ideologies here were foreign in approach and showed little references to the place it came to. It was the exact Deco of Europe that had set itself in the country, non-affected by the strong personality of India. Bombay was exposed to European currents in fashion transmitted by regular waves of people who arrived there, including architects and designers in search of work. Prosperous Business people, whose success under British rule had given them a high regard for western thinking, were particularly receptive to the European taste and it was precisely this group that financed the development of the city.
The Coming of Art deco ideas in the city epitomized modernity, reflecting it visually in its new architecture, whose elegant streamlines forms, sparse put potent ornament and machine aesthetics glamorized the new age and its technologies. Although the social and cultural conditions that inspired the art deco in the west was largely absent in the Indian social and cultural environment, yet Art deco opened minds and gave way to the idea of modernism here.
However, the rich Indian dictionary of culture, design, motifs, architecture and other such “could-be” inspirations were not utilized in this cultural revival. A foreign concept, it came and pasted itself onto the Indian background without much alterations and considerations.
A great Art deco palace built between the 1931 and 1944 , the new palace in Morvi is a carnival of de luxe Art deco commissioned by maharaja Mahendrasinhji Lakhdiraj. The exterior of pink plaster defined by strong horizontal lines accentuates the building’s architecture embracing the horizontal with its long and low structure and curved corners. Borrowing from the styles of the ocean liners, luxury hotels and cinema interiors of the period, the palace exemplifies a charmed living in the cocktail age.
The new palace with its clean, functional and unimaginative appearance belongs in inspiration firmly to the age of pre-stressed concrete rather than to the age of distressed stone, even though it is in fact constructed of the local granite. Inside however, the princely India is having its last fling. Six drawing rooms, six dining rooms and fourteen bedrooms jostle for space with swimming pool, card room, billiard room and bar. The rooms decorated and designed in art deco style, even down to such details as tubular-framed furniture are pure European in taste. Lifts descend to a subterranean bedroom decorated with erotic murals, and a bathroom made of seashells.”-(The Palaces of India By the Maharaja Of Baroda.)The “Indianness” in the deco tradition is restricted only to the artworks with manipulated Indian themes. (pics from the book Palaces of India by maharaja of baroda)
Another stylish Art Deco royal residence was Manik Bagh, commissioned by Yeshwant Rao Holgar, the Maharaja of Indore in 1930. This new palace in Indore, stands besides the old, in the centre of the city. It is said to be synonymous with the Maharani, whom a British officer once described as,” very much the type of modern English public-school girl, a good tennis player and very up-to-date in fashions of dress”
“Society painter Bernard boutet de monvel’s portraits of the prince in traditional Maratha and western evening dress captures his elegant and self –assured style in both worlds.”
An art enthusiast, oriented towards the Western avant-grade in Paris, heir to the ancient Holkar family, Yeshwant Rao Holkar had the palace decorated by the architect Eckart Muthesius, of the same age, with technical and aesthetic refinements; darkly tinted and clear window panes in metal frames for regulating the light of day, the first air conditioning system in India, unusually simple furniture of wood and metal, pictorial carpets, lighting fixtures as light sculptures, walls treated in alternating colors, Para vents as cubist paintings in space. Art for living made a fairy tale palace of modernism in India come true.
Ruhlmann, Wassali Luckhardt, Micheal Dufet and Eileen gray are a few names from which the interior elements were sourced. The interiors of Manik Bagh featured both highly simplified, functional, serially produced furniture and more decorative, individual pieces in exotic materials in the high French style.
Another Art deco masterpiece, Umaid Bhawan, in Jodhpur was build by maharaja Umaid Singh between 1929 to 1944 as an employment project during the period of prolonged droughts. The palace architecture is a curious synthesis of Art Deco and indigenous architectural and decorative traditions.
The architectural detailing of Umaid Bhawan is principally Indian, but the clean lines and streamlined, cool treatment of sculptural elements are entirely Deco in style. Although there was a peek of Indian influence in the architecture, motifs, soft furnishings, murals and paintings visible in the Palace but the furniture and the interior still were a European statement.
However in viewing this style/movement under the lens today, replicating it or even following the same lines of design makes no sense. If art Deco in India has to be reinterpreted today, it’ll be of a little altered nature. The ability to assimilate and modernize local decorative traditions of the style can be very well used to design and re-design objects which stand for the “new” and the “modern” and yet have a flair of India in them.
In the spirit of the Deco for the search of the “modernistic,” receptive to changing times, yet respecting the traditions and techniques of the past- the new Indo-deco derives itself from the luxuriant and elegant French taste but transformed by regional influences. The style is for the modern Indian house, following the French Deco traditions- clean lines, restrained stylized decorations and simplistic. The Indianess of the furniture comes from the form, technique or the materials that India has to provide.”

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Art Deco Features

Exterior features of art deco structures:

Stepped back features, but the roofs have only flat rooflines. If a skyscraper appears to have a taper it is usually the exterior lines, and not the actual roof itself. The architecture often includes balconies and roof over-hangings to compliment the exterior lines of the building.
Devoid of decorations elsewhere, art deco buildings tend to have ornate entranceways. Hence a building having a rather austere exterior, yet with a somewhat grand and ornate entranceway, might indicate an art deco structure.

Materials and Colors

Ornamented with trims and moldings in terra cotta tiles, glass blocks, aluminum, colored glass or stainless steel the exterior structure of an art deco building would usually be in concrete, stucco or brick.
glazed terra-cotta, Vitrolite, ceramic or gloss metallic panels and glass brick.

Art deco structures exhibit a subdued color palette mostly – tans, crèmes, whites or exposed concrete color.The ornamentation or trims are often in pastel colors: warm pinks, mint or light green, peaches and mauves. But a stark contrast is also visible at times when the trims go on to the other side of a spectrum, exhibiting a bold look of black shiny aluminum or stainless steel.
Combinations in contrasting colors, color which deviate slightly from each other, rich deep non related colors – cobalt blue, deep, dark, fiery red, sparse rich or subtle bold; Art deco ornamentation exhibits a wide style.
Unlike the predecessor Noveau, Deco architects believed in working with the natural beauty of the structure and using the ornamental detail to highlight the overall aesthetic of the building, rather than overpowering and cluttering with excessive details.

Windows

Porthole, resembling the round windows found on an ocean liner it pursued a nautical look.
Eg. Coca cola plant building in LA. But an Art deco building, especially home designs, will only employ the use of a single porthole window to highlight the same nautical theme.
Other windows style varied with the kind of art deco treatment that the building followed. E.g. in Jazz-age deco, the windows were shaped to compliment the verticality of the building, taking the form of tall slender bay windows.
Whereas in Streamline Deco the openings tended to be long, ribbon like windows that fit into the streamlined shape of the exterior.
Bauhaus, a style that competed with Art deco in the same period also had the similar long, slender windows incorporated in the structures. But Deco windows often flowed with the exterior of the buildings wrapping around at the edges and the corners of the buildings. The international style or Bauhaus was box-like and had little fluidity in its exterior lines. Streamline Moderne deco windows were evidenced by the use of curved glass or glass block which followed the smooth lines of the buildings exterior shape contributing to the buildings grace.

DECO ENTERS THE ORDINARY LANDSCAPE

By the mid 1930s, Art Deco architecture shifted from an elite style to a more broadly accepted form of architecture. It began to appear in far more prosaic structures, such as diners and gas stations. The common stainless steel diners, found across the American cultural landscape reflect the horizontal expression and the look of motion attributed to Streamline Moderne Deco. Society had become enamored with speed and motion, and the Streamline Moderne diners, with their rakish appearance, had the look of "built in motion." The Art Deco styled diner, sheathed in stainless steel, looked like a dining car speeding down the railroad track, and became a permanent fixture of the ordinary cultural landscape. Diners became an American icon. The classic "diner look" conjured up an image of a certain menu, the availability of comfort food, and fast efficient service; attributes which are still associated with diners to the present day. Businesses utilized the Streamline Moderne Art Deco as a way of advertising a business establishment. In this manner, many Art Deco gas stations were built with a consistent appearance according to standards adopted by oil companies. Texaco service stations, for example, created a corporate image based on designs by Walter Teague in 1937. Teague utilized the clean lines of Streamline Moderne to create an image of cleanliness and service efficiency. More importantly, due to the universal appearance of Texaco's White "Oasis" service stations, with their distinctive three green "Speed Stripes" encasing the station, motorists were able to recognize a Texaco station from a distance and before a competitor's. This consistent appearance would be associated to consistent service in the minds of customers. Thus, Art Deco helped foster the "iconization" of American business. Through icons, businesses were able to build a competitive advantage over competitors that lacked an established image or a recognizable corporate symbol.
Just as the Chrysler Building is the epitome of the earlier era, the Coca-Cola bottling plant of Los Angeles is a wonderful example of the horizontal motion associated with Streamline Moderne Deco structures. With its portholes as windows, and a ship's bridge for navigating, the bottling plant gives the appearance of an ocean liner. Although the building is firmly rooted in a sea of concrete and blacktop, it looks as though it could navigate the sprawling urban landscape of Los Angeles.

CRAFT VS MANUFACTURING (the CHICAGO WORLD FAIR 1933)

Although Art Deco had European origins, it was America that modified it and embraced its wide appeal. By the late 1920s, American architects had great success incorporating Art Deco architecture into the cultural landscape of major urban centers. American architectural influence continued into the 1930s, increasingly becoming a world center of creative design. U.S. Designers forged new paths, even with the onset of the Great Depression -- achieving ultimate pre-eminence with the Chicago World's Fair of 1933. Its theme was, "The Century of Progress". Nowhere was this progress more evident than in the United States. In Europe, the wide distribution of Art Deco products was hampered by being tied to the handwork of craftsmen and artisans, who essentially created the "look" of Art Deco through meticulous skill, as shown by a silver tea service set. Made of fine silver and ebony handles, it exhibited at the Paris Exposition in 1925. Its production was limited, however, due to the fact that it was essentially hand made. In America, Art Deco designs were being integrally linked to the industrial complex. Taking inspiration from the auto and aircraft industries, products and buildings were designed in the new elegant style, yet made available to the masses through the efficiencies of machine production. This contrast between crafts from Europe and manufacturing from America was highlighted at the Chicago World's Fair in 1933.

The streamlining of America

With the articulation of the new concept of streamlining by Norman Bel Geddes, in 1932, the look and functionality of every consumer product changed, allowing the manufacturer to produce goods as efficiently as possible and with a clean uncluttered appearance.

The U. S. automobile industry took the streamline trend to heart, both as an outward appearance and an enhancement to performance that the style afforded. Although often perceived by the buying public as simply a visual effect, this new style was built for speed and motion. The epitome of this expression was found in aviation's DC-3, an airplane design conceptualized to be "Streamlined.”

The DC-3, manufactured by the Douglas Aircraft Corporation, exhibited a new shape--aerodynamic and aesthetically beautiful .It gave credence to the expression "Form follows Function." Rid of any unnecessary detailing and features that would adversely affect its performance, the DC-3 set new standards for aviation efficiency and flight. Unlike planes that preceded it, the DC-3's single wing, void of external supports, produced considerably less aerodynamic drag. Compared to the Ford Tri-Motor, the DC-3's wing surfaces were of smooth, rolled aluminum, while rippled metal encased the Tri-Motor. This allowed the DC-3 to use only two engines while achieving still better operating performance than the Tri-Motor. Clearly, "streamlining" the design was not just for appearance.

The Streamlining trend in American design was quickly embraced by architects and led ultimately to the United States becoming more of an innovator of style rather than the imitator. No longer was Europe viewed as the premier center of design and architecture. As America in the 1930s churned out new mass-produced products, impressively scaled structures and new fashion trends, the world took notice. Art Deco had reached its most sublime form of expression. "Simple lines are beautiful," wrote Paul T. Frankl, a noted industrial designer of the Art Deco era.

"Streamline Deco" tended to be utilized by structures that were an integral part of an efficient way of life, whether at work or at home. Many factories constructed in the Art Deco era were shrouded in Streamline Deco. Similar to the Jazz-age bank buildings, factories designed in Streamline Deco conveyed to the public more than just a factory that provided employment. Such styling announced that here was an efficient manufacturing center, a place where" products would be produced in the most modem and productive manner possible.

THE STREAMLINE MODERNA PHASE OF ART DECO ARCHITECTURE

The second later phase of Art Deco styling coincides with the economic pressure that plunged the world into crisis in the 1930s. The economic depression forced designers to build their products in the new "cleaner" lines of the "Depression Deco" phase of the Art Deco movement. Other synonymous names for this Art Deco period are the "Streamline Moderne," and "Art Moderne." Buildings created after the onset of the Great Depression were called "Streamline" because of an emphasis on the horizontal, uncluttered stream of the exterior. The look of Streamline Moderne was increasingly austere, and aerodynamic. The demand for cost savings made "Depression Deco" almost void of ornamentation, other than details incorporated into the actual structure. Where "Zig-zag Deco" emphasized verticality, "Streamline Deco" emphasized the horizontal. While "Jazz-age Deco" was rectilinear, "Depression Deco" was more curvilinear with graceful, smooth exterior lines.

JAZZ DECO

Jazz deco was also the preferred style when built by the corporate America to impress. These structures exuded prestige and stability, yet also progressiveness. Numerous banks were designed in Art deco. Although being conservative in regards to style, in 1920s banks were trying to lure customers by creating a new look for their traditional bank buildings. No bank or business house that claimed progressiveness would stay in quarters that were cluttered and unattractive.

A large part of the appeal to patronage is based on the building that it occupies (Auger, Sept. 1931: 266)." Jazz-age Deco fit perfectly. Through this style, a bank could give the impression of being stylistic in an understated way. The facades of many of the Jazz-age Deco bank buildings are impressive in their geometric styles and the rich, subtle detailing that evokes a restrained elegance befitting a financial institution. Other structures that tended to apply the Jazz-age Deco style included many corporate headquarters buildings; especially those involved with new burgeoning industries such as automotive, electric utilities, and communication companies.

With the Jazz-age Deco, these promising new industries were able to convey the message that they were enterprises that would be a stable part of the economy and were destined to play prominent roles well into the future of modem society.

NEW YORY CITY ZONING LAW


It forbades any building over a certain height to occupy the same amount of area at the top of the structure as the base. Thus all the sky-scrapers have to taper as they attained ever increasing heights. This law prevents New york’s street from plunging into darkness.
Thus this distinctive Art deco Scraper received its characteristic stepped back pattern through a combination of the mayan influences seen in Paris and the modified height ordinance of the New york city.
With major efforts to incorporate this style into new skyscrapers this started to be referred to as the skyscraper style.

THE HOLLYWOOD STORY

The diffusion of the image of art deco into America was highly triggered by the Hollywood industry. In the Paris exposition a set designer from Hollywood, Cedric gibbons was present. Gibbons thought his sets helped created this new Hollywood image which promoted glamour and futuristic design centered on Art deco. In 1928 the movie “ Our Dancing Daughters” made a big impact on the audiences to use Art deco for its complete set and created enthusiasm for the new style. By the late 1920s numerous films promoted this new Hollywood image and thus the presence of this world created on the screen was wished for in the cities. (logos of studios)

THE PARIS EXPOSITION OF 1925

The formal debut of art deco was the 1925 Exposition des Arts Decoratifs et Industriels in Paris.

Expositions were hugely influential in disseminating new ideas and trends but the last two decades it was interrupted because of the World War. The scope of the Paris exposition was tremendous. With more than 150 pavilions built in the city centre, between the Effiel tower and the place de la Concorde, interspersed with numerous cafes restaurants, theatres, monuments, plazas and gardens.

The exposition encompassed all realms of design. From an architectural perspective, pavilions were built by participating nations to display their contribution to architectural design and theory. The host nation, France, impressed most attendees in terms of architecture and design style introduced.

United states didn’t participate officially. Herbert Hoover ( the secretary of commerce ), did not believe that American designers could meet enrty requirements- producting truly new designs that did not borrow from the ancient styles or were not imitations of previous works from other countries.

Th fact that the us govt had such little faith in the works of their designers really helped inspire the designers there. So did attend the expo and they returned home wit an attitude that they indeed could contribute to the world of modern design after all, and this resulted in a creative boom in the country. The American designers were no longer inclined to think that they were inferior to their European colleagues. They felt little was new in terms of architectural design at the Paris exposition, as stated by Raymond hood. The exposition only helped convince American architects to embrace further the art deco style.

THE YEAR 1922

Two events responsible for art decos impact on architecture in America:

CHICAGO TRIBUNE HEADQUARTERS : the tribune, Chicago’s premier newspaper, had established a competition for architects around the world to submit designs for its new head quarters.

The winning submission went to American Raymond Hood and his traditional Gothic styled skyscraper, the second place design, submitted by Eliel Saarinen , a young finnish architect, was art deco.

Although the design didn’t win any prize but it created an enthusiastic discussion among the American architects and also on the competition winner Raymond Hood.

Later when Hood won the bid to make the headquarters of the American radiator company in New York, he incorporated saarinen’s philosophy. Combining gothic with art deco, the American radiator building in 1924 represented the first art deco skyscraper builiding in the united states.

Later after the paris exhibition hood recounted” the paris exhibition of 1925 was less directly influential ( than saarinen’s design) as far as architecture was concerned. In the end the show was most helpful in that it re-emphasized to the American architect that tradition could be left behind.”

THE DISCOVERY OF TUTANKHAMUN’S TOMB : This discovery by howard carter of the ancient pharaoh of Egypt, awakned an interest in early Egyptian civilization. Pharaohs, tombs and the glorification of civilization through architecture intrigued modern architects which broadned to other ancient civilizations around the world.

Themes associated with past civilazations, were incorporated in art deco structures, most notable Egyptian, Mayan, Aztec.

Both these events in 1922, signified the bold vision for the future that was expressed by Art Deco, and yet at the same time, bestowed great honour and respect for ancient civilizations and their contributions to contemporary architecture and design.

SIDE NOTES

1920’s to 1950s

coined in 1968 by bevis hiller ( art deco- the style of 1920’s and the 1930s)

“juxtapose style against art nouveau”

“Abbreviated exposition des arts decoratifs et industrials”

Art nouveau( floral and elaborative, expensive to maintain) vs art deco( bold, stark, crisp, clean and uncluttered buildings, yet refined and elegant)

Apparently the movement emerged in 1925 from the paris expositon.

First part of twentieth centuary was marked by great changes in the society- after shock of the WorldWar I and the visions that it spawned about the future of western civilization. Economy went from boom to bust. World peace was destroyed and then restored. Advances in numerous technologies led to both a depction of a wonderful future world and apocalyptic visions of a world gone awry. This dichotomy of future visions was expressed through architecture, especially in Europe (the then centre of world cultural influence).

Traditional architects sought to avert disaster by sticking to the classical designs of the ancient architecture, while ultra-modernists embraced a minimal philosophy reflected in bauhaus and international style of architecture. Art deco in contrast to these sought to locate a modern vision that embraced technology, yet symbolically referenced ancient civilizations of the past.

A highly stylized design movement after world war 1, art deco architecture was most noticible in paris . in 1922 a young European architect introduced American architects to the possibility of art deco.

ART DECO ( Encyclopedia of 20th-century architecture )

The term is a now firmly established designation for an aesthetic of the late 1920s and 1930s that in its own day was called art.

In architecture, the style took various forms, each of which has prompted historians to devise different identifying terminology. In the 1960s, the more ornamental phase of popular modernism was dubbed Art Deco, echoing the name of the 1925 Parisian Exposition des Arts Decoratifs et Industriels Modernes, where the style’s formal design motifs, patterns, and decorative predilections were first observed. Recognizing in Deco a character both modern and abstract but a style that nevertheless avoided the white, volumetric, and planar reductivism of the emerging 1920s “Bauhaus Modern,” some historians referred to the style as “modernistic,” that is, pseudomodern or approaching modern. These and other design terms and stylistic labels have been applied to the several dimensions of Art Deco architecture after the mid-1920s.

Inspired by the aerodynamic forms and kinetic lines emerging from the drafting boards of industrial designers, a “Streamline Moderne” architectural style (dubbed “nautical moderne” when marine imagery was most explicit) evolved as one of quintessential styles of the 1930s. In architecture, it borrowed from the streamlining evidenced in the forms of new transportation machines—planes, trains, ships, and automobiles—and streamlining was most frequently applied to buildings that served these transportation machines: air terminal buildings, bus terminals, marinas, and especially such roadside buildings as diners, gas stations, and car dealerships. Recognizing that streamlining’s paring down of moderne forms to the ultimate teardrop was paralleled by a general economy of line and form and that this restraint was considered appropriate in a period of economic depression, writers employed the term Depression modern to describe elements of selected examples of the later Deco-era aesthetic. Finally, when 1930s government architects looked to a restrained classicism to communicate an image of authority and order, a Deco-era “modern classic” derivation presented itself in county courthouses, New Deal-era post offices, and other government architecture.

The Art Deco period in architecture, therefore, was polyglot and multifarious, an age in which Progressivism and modernity were embedded in different forms in which the more conservative Deco stylists, often traditional Beaux-Arts-trained designers, might express their ornamental predispositions in more abstract modern terms. Likewise, classicists might mollify earlier Edwardian enthusiasm for the baroque in favor of a new monumentalism that was simpler, plain surfaced, and grand without being grandiloquent. Finally, the more avant-garde modernists offered a populist, ornamental, and colorful’art decoratif of recognized, albeit abstracted, motifs.

The Art Deco era was fundamentally a 20th-century machine age. In Deco reliefs and architectural ornament, a knife-edged profile transformed human, animal, and plant forms into low-relief sculptural representations treated as faceted machine-cut patterns of light and shadow. Similarly, a Streamline Moderne building’s curved corners, neon signage, marquees, and “drivethrough” features, as found in diners, bus terminals, and gas stations alike, merely borrowed forms from the period’s machine, especially from transportation and industrial designs. Architecture was characterized by a transmogrification of aerodynamic shapes and surfaces from streamlined fenders, curved car bodies, and zephyr like lines of speed that, by the 1930s, shaped and accented Chrysler Air Flows, Hupmobiles, Cords, and other contemporary sedans and coupes of the day. Comparable architectural elements emerged from designs first shaping airplane fuselages and wing sections, from the aerodynamic shrouds enveloping the Pennsylvania S-1 locomotive or bull-nosed Studebakers of Raymond Loewy, or from the hydrodynamic hull of a Norman Bel Geddes futuristic ocean liner. Moreover, during the Deco era, technology (in the form of steel-frame construction, reinforced concrete, and plate glass) provided the means to build skyscrapers higher than ever before, making the Chrysler Building (1930), the Empire State Building (1930–31), Rockefeller Center (1931–40), and indeed, the entire skyline of New York icons of the age.

The period was also quintessentially an era of popular modernism. Cosmetic Deco and moderne facades brought a face-lift to Main Street America by an applied architectonic skin of colorful, glazed terra-cotta, Vitrolite, ceramic or gloss metallic panels, glass brick, neon, and other Deco-era materials. At the same moment that European modernists such as Le Corbusier, Walter Gropius, and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe were defining an avant- garde modern style based on lack of or minimal color, no ornament, and an emphasis of volume over mass, popular ornamentalists in America rejected the utilitarian for the visual, the intellectual for the sensual, the rational for the expressive, and the sociological for the purely decorative. Art Deco was jazzy, bright, sexy, loud, and visually appealing. If Bauhaus modernism and the International Style appeared to limit its focus to functionalism at the exclusion of emotionalism or expressionism, Art Deco found its appeal in the very color and excitement that polychromatic stylized facades, neon lighting, and zigzag profiles communicated.

Recognizing Deco’s increasing presence on Main Street, in Kress and F.W.Woolworth five-and-dimes, in arty neighborhood theaters with their sunburst splashed facades, and in chic department stores and other commercial emporia, historians have characterized the Art Deco style as transcending social class, as egalitarian and democratic, and as the modern aesthetic of the people. Even today, a revived Art Deco is in evidence at populist marketplaces as the preferred style of perfumeries and at the cosmetic displays of department stores. This neo-Deco, both chic and cheap, parallels the rebirth in the 1980s of the Streamline Moderne in roadside architecture as evidenced in nostalgic diners and drive-through hamburger chains.

Landmarks of Art Deco architecture, therefore, are less often palaces of royalty, cathedrals, or monumental institutional buildings and more often commercial, Main Street, and roadside structures—indeed, department stores were nicknamed “people’s palaces,” and skyscrapers of the period were called modernistic cathedrals of commerce. Among the most noteworthy were Timothy Pflueger’s Paramount Theater (1929) in Oakland, California; G.Albert Lansberg’s Warner Brothers’ Western (Wiltern) Theater (1930) in Los Angeles; B.Marcus Priteca’s Pantages Theater (1929) in Hollywood; and Donald Deskey’s Radio City Music Hall (1931) in New York. Only occasionally was the style of cathedrals of commerce applied to genuinely religious edifices: First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Perth, Western Australia, designed by Ochiltree and Hargreave, is a notable late Deco church of 1939, although perhaps the best-known religious building of the idiom is the 1929 Boston Avenue Methodist Episcopal Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, by Ada M.Robinson and Bruce Goff.

The true cathedral of commerce on Main Street, however, was the department store, which ranged from such landmarks as Bullock’s Wiltshire store (Los Angeles, 1928) by John and Donald Parkinson to scores of F.W.Woolworths, Kress fiveand-dimes, and small boutiques in small towns nationwide. However, the vertical giants of commerce were the skyscrapers. These were sometimes actually dressed in a Gothic Deco, as at Atlanta’s City Hall (1930) by G.Lloyd Preacher. Generally, however, the Deco skyscraper rose skyward to form towering commercial ziggurats and office buildings in New York whose prominence advertised sponsoring companies. McGraw-Hill (1931, Raymond Hood), Barclay-Vesey Telephone (1923–26, Ralph T.Walker), Chrysler (1930, William Van Alen), and RCA Victor (1931, Cross and Cross) were the ultimate Deco exemplars of capitalist architecture.

Encyclopedia of 20th-century architecture 126

Barbizon Apartment Hotel, Ocean Drive, Art Deco district, Miami Beach

© Historic American Buildings Survey/Library of Congress Indeed, the extensive construction of taller urban office buildings and apartment towers during the Deco era has prompted some historians to label Art Deco the “skyscraper style.” Distinctive zigzag setbacks brought Deco skyscrapers a jazz-aged syncopated profile, a feature that was initially required by the 1916 zoning ordinance in New York but soon developed as a style. Beyond the New York landmarks cited previously, Manhattan’s Deco masterpieces included the Waldorf Astoria Hotel (1930, Schultze and Weaver), the Chanin Building (1927–29, Sloan and Robertson), the Panhellenic Tower (1929, John Mead Howells), and the Film Center Building (1928–29, Ely Jacques Kahn). The 450 Sutter Building (1928, Timothy P Flueger) in San Francisco and the W.W.Orr Building (1930, Pringle and Smith) in Atlanta are two medical office buildings whose relief panels and ornament reflect the popular modern style, the former’s decoration employing Mayan elements, the latter a Decoesque serpent and staff of Asclepius. Among the ornamentalists enriching Deco buildings were muralists and sculptors. Among the most representative period murals were those executed between 1934 and 1943 for 1,100 local post offices under the sponsorship of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Section of Painting and Sculpture (later known as the Section of Fine Arts). Most notable among Deco sculptors was Lee Lawry, whose relief carvings and sculpture may be seen at the Nebraska State Capitol (1919–32, Bertram G.Goodhue), the Louisiana State Capitol (1930–32, Weiss, Dreyfous, and Seiferth), and Bok Tower (Mountain Lake Singing Tower, 1929, Milton B.Medary) as well as at Rockefeller Center.

In southern Florida, Miami Beach preserves an entire historic district of Art Deco hotels, apartment buildings, and other period landmarks by architects Henry Hohauser, L.Murray Dixon, Anton Skislewicz, and others. Notable works include Hohauser’s Hotel Park Central (1937) and Hotel Cardozo (1939), Dixon’s Marlin Hotel (1939) and Ritz Plaza (1940), and Skislewicz’s Breakwater Hotel (1939) and Plymouth Hotel (1940). These works synthesize modern and Art Deco elements into a unique blend of 1930s ornament, streamlining, and ribbon windows accented in these ocean side structures with local decorative references and regional themes, including waves, palm trees, fountains, flamingos, fish, sails, portholes, ship bows, and rising bubbles. Since the 1980s, revitalization of the beachfront Deco color palette on refurbished facades and in rehabilitated hotel lobbies in a Postmodern vein has created a “tropical Deco” style that has transformed an originally predominantly white architecture into a wash of pastels, rainbow figure-ground profiles, and neon-enhanced pizzazz. In Los Angeles, Sunset Towers (1929, Leland A.Bryant) is comparable in form to Miami Beach’s smaller-scale residential blocks, and further echoes of this domestic Deco found its way into private residences.

The only large collection of like Art Deco structures to rival Miami Beach is the town of Napier, New Zealand, substantially destroyed by an earthquake and rebuilt within a short period of the 1930s. Both a Mediterranean or Spanish Mission style and a Deco- informed international modern informed nearby Hastings, New Zealand, but the rebuilding of the commercial district of Napier provides an unusual concentration of period architecture in a city well off the beaten track. Moreover, a remarkable body of Art Deco architecture survives in major Australian cities including theater architecture by William Leighton (Windsor, 1937, in Nedlands and Perth) and Samuel Rosenthal (Beacon, 1937, South Fremantle) as well as Deco office buildings in Sydney (City Mutual Building, 1934–36, Emil Sodersten) and Melbourne (ACA Building, c.1936, attributed to Hennessy and Hennessy). A strong presence of streamlining and flatroofed, ribbon-windowed modernism informed this region’s international Deco, with Australian architects achieving designs of additional interest when ornamental accents included kookaburra birds and other native references. Australia’s quintessential Art Deco landmark, however, is a monumental Deco classic: C. Bruce Dellit’s powerful Anzac Memorial in Hyde Park, Sydney, dating from 1934. Embodying the monumental form, decorative detail, and spirit of the best formal, public side of the Art Deco style, the Anzac Memorial, like smaller monuments of the period nationwide, is an emotionally charged memorial to the Australian and New Zealand fallen from the world wars.

Such a restrained yet monumental modern classic was foreshadowed in the World War I memorials by British architect Sir Edwin Lutyens, including his Whitehall Cenotaph (1919–22) in London and reflected in the work of Paul Cret (Folger’s Shakespeare Library, 1929–31, Washington, D.C., and National Naval Medical Center, 1939–41, Bethesda, Maryland). The Palais de Chaillot (1937) by Carlu, Boileau, and AzĂ©ma is Paris’s best example. In the United States during the same period, the modern classic phase of Art Deco architecture is represented by Goodhue’s Los Angeles City Hall (1922), San Francisco’s Veterans Hospital (1934, designed by the U.S. Treasury.

The modern classic and Depression modern character finds its way into Holabird and Roche’s Chicago Board of Trade Building (1929–30) and the same architects’ Chicago Daily News Building (1929). However, it is given its most evocative representation in Hugh Ferriss’s renderings of dramatic urban towers, as published in his Metropolis of 1929, whose images appeared immediately brought to fruition in Buffalo’s City Hall (1929–31) by George J.Dietel and John J.Wade. Indeed, Ferriss’s influence is seen as late as the 1990s, as evidenced by Rabun Hatch and Associates’ GLG Grand (1992) in Atlanta.

The 1939 New York World’s Fair closed the late moderne era with clear evidence that the decade had been dominated by streamlining. At the fair, the General Motors Highways and Horizons Exhibit, including the Futurama, presented the World of Tomorrow as envisioned by Norman Bel Geddes, a world of and for the automobile encouraging the free-flowing movement of goods and people across the continent. In 1932 Bel Geddes had published his industrial designs (particularly planes, trains, and cars) in Horizons.

The streamlined phase of Art Deco focused the attention of designers on roadside architecture. W.W. Arrasmith of Louisville, Kentucky, designed bus depots for Greyhound, including those for Evansville, Indiana (1938), Washington, D.C. (1939), and Atlanta (1940), the latter now hidden under a hideous “modernization” two decades ago. George D.Brown’s Atlantic Greyhound Bus Terminal in Columbia, South Carolina, shows the influence of Arrasmith’s streamlining that informed such structures nationally. Similarly, Texaco commissioned Walter Dorwin Teague to design standardized service stations, and variations on five models were sited at prime corner building sites nationwide.

In private and public realms alike, electronics, transportation, radio communication, and other scientific and technological ad vances were viewed as signs of the progress of the age, and images of these modern marvels adorned murals and ceiling paintings and shaped neon outlines in signage and advertising. Representations of the machine informed industrial photography, motion picture and theater sets, and the sharp-edged profiles of Charles Sheeler landscapes and Ferdinand Leger figures. In architecture, the Deco-era design impulses, in Streamline Moderne, modern classic, or faceted Art Deco style, were a synthesis of tradition and Progressive design, nature and the machine, and the ornamental as well as the abstract. In all, Art Deco architecture was both modern and popular, and although associated with known designers and stylists, some of its most ubiquitous forms are anonymous and found along the roadside.